linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/30] NT synchronization primitive driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:18:56 -0500
From: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, wine-devel@...ehq.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
 wine-devel@...ehq.org,
 André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>,
 Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
 Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/30] NT synchronization primitive driver

On Tuesday, 16 April 2024 16:18:24 CDT Elizabeth Figura wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 April 2024 03:14:21 CDT Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I don't support GE has it in his builds? Last time I tried, building
> > Wine was a bit of a pain.
> 
> It doesn't seem so. I tried to build a GE-compatible ntsync build, uploaded
> here (thanks Arek for hosting):
> 
>     https://f002.backblazeb2.com/file/wine-ntsync/ntsync-wine.tar.xz

Oops, the initial version I uploaded had broken paths. Should be fixed now.

(It's also broken on an unpatched kernel unless explicitly disabled with 
WINE_DISABLE_FAST_SYNC=1. Not sure what I messed up there—it should fall back 
cleanly—but hopefully shouldn't be too important for testing.)