linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] mtd: spi-nor: get rid of SPI_NOR_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <33e8e9c1-9b96-4b46-ac63-2827924ccf83@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:47:13 +0100
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>, Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
 Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] mtd: spi-nor: get rid of SPI_NOR_NO_FR



On 4/12/24 15:03, Michael Walle wrote:
> On Fri Apr 12, 2024 at 4:00 PM CEST, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/12/24 14:44, Michael Walle wrote:
>>> The evervision FRAM devices are the only user of the NO_FR flag. Drop
>>> the global flag and instead use a manufacturer fixup for the evervision
>>> flashes to drop the fast read support.
>>>
>>
>> Don't we want to get rid of FRAMs from SPI NOR? Why the dance then?
> 
> Yes, but it isn't that easy. There are (three?) in-tree users of
> these chips. But we can already move all the special handling out of
> the core.
> 

Okay.