[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zh4OemsI1Ant9rfg@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 07:36:58 +0200
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Vishal Moola <vishal.moola@...il.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+ad1b592fc4483655438b@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] KASAN: slab-use-after-free Read in
__vma_reservation_common
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 05:35:50AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Why does hugetlbfs use VM_MAYSHARE while regular faults use VM_SHARED?
It goes back to:
commit f83a275dbc5ca1721143698e844243fcadfabf6a
Author: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Date: Thu May 28 14:34:40 2009 -0700
mm: account for MAP_SHARED mappings using VM_MAYSHARE and not VM_SHARED in hugetlbfs
"hugetlbfs currently checks if a VMA is MAP_SHARED with the VM_SHARED flag
and not VM_MAYSHARE. For file-backed mappings, such as hugetlbfs,
VM_SHARED is set only if the mapping is MAP_SHARED and the file was opened
read-write. If a shared memory mapping was mapped shared-read-write for
populating of data and mapped shared-read-only by other processes, then
hugetlbfs would account for the mapping as if it was MAP_PRIVATE. This
causes processes to fail to map the file MAP_SHARED even though it should
succeed as the reservation is there."
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists