| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240416071722.45997-5-ryncsn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 15:17:22 +0800
From: Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/4] mm/filemap: optimize filemap folio adding
From: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
Instead of doing multiple tree walks, do one optimism range check with
lock hold, and exit if raced with another insertion. If a shadow exists,
check it with a new xas_get_order helper before releasing the lock to
avoid redundant tree walks for getting its order.
Drop the lock and do the allocation only if a split is needed.
In the best case, it only need to walk the tree once. If it needs to
alloc and split, 3 walks are issued (One for first ranged conflict check
and order retrieving, one for the second check after allocation, one for
the insert after split).
Testing with 4K pages, in an 8G cgroup, with 16G brd as block device:
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
fio -name=cached --numjobs=16 --filename=/mnt/test.img \
--buffered=1 --ioengine=mmap --rw=randread --time_based \
--ramp_time=30s --runtime=5m --group_reporting
Before:
bw ( MiB/s): min= 1027, max= 3520, per=100.00%, avg=2445.02, stdev=18.90, samples=8691
iops : min=263001, max=901288, avg=625924.36, stdev=4837.28, samples=8691
After (+7.3%):
bw ( MiB/s): min= 493, max= 3947, per=100.00%, avg=2625.56, stdev=25.74, samples=8651
iops : min=126454, max=1010681, avg=672142.61, stdev=6590.48, samples=8651
Test result with THP (do a THP randread then switch to 4K page in hope it
issues a lot of splitting):
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
fio -name=cached --numjobs=16 --filename=/mnt/test.img \
--buffered=1 --ioengine=mmap -thp=1 --readonly \
--rw=randread --time_based --ramp_time=30s --runtime=10m \
--group_reporting
fio -name=cached --numjobs=16 --filename=/mnt/test.img \
--buffered=1 --ioengine=mmap \
--rw=randread --time_based --runtime=5s --group_reporting
Before:
bw ( KiB/s): min= 4141, max=14202, per=100.00%, avg=7935.51, stdev=96.85, samples=18976
iops : min= 1029, max= 3548, avg=1979.52, stdev=24.23, samples=18976ยท
READ: bw=4545B/s (4545B/s), 4545B/s-4545B/s (4545B/s-4545B/s), io=64.0KiB (65.5kB), run=14419-14419msec
After (+12.5%):
bw ( KiB/s): min= 4611, max=15370, per=100.00%, avg=8928.74, stdev=105.17, samples=19146
iops : min= 1151, max= 3842, avg=2231.27, stdev=26.29, samples=19146
READ: bw=4635B/s (4635B/s), 4635B/s-4635B/s (4635B/s-4635B/s), io=64.0KiB (65.5kB), run=14137-14137msec
The performance is better for both 4K (+7.5%) and THP (+12.5%) cached read.
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
---
lib/test_xarray.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/filemap.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_xarray.c b/lib/test_xarray.c
index 0efde8f93490..8732a311f613 100644
--- a/lib/test_xarray.c
+++ b/lib/test_xarray.c
@@ -2017,6 +2017,64 @@ static noinline void check_xas_get_order(struct xarray *xa)
}
}
+static noinline void check_xas_conflict_get_order(struct xarray *xa)
+{
+ XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0);
+
+ void *entry;
+ int only_once;
+ unsigned int max_order = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI) ? 20 : 1;
+ unsigned int order;
+ unsigned long i, j, k;
+
+ for (order = 0; order < max_order; order++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
+ xas_set_order(&xas, i << order, order);
+ do {
+ xas_lock(&xas);
+ xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_value(i));
+ xas_unlock(&xas);
+ } while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure xas_get_order works with xas_for_each_conflict.
+ */
+ j = i << order;
+ for (k = 0; k < order; k++) {
+ only_once = 0;
+ xas_set_order(&xas, j + (1 << k), k);
+ xas_lock(&xas);
+ xas_for_each_conflict(&xas, entry) {
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_value(i));
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_get_order(&xas) != order);
+ only_once++;
+ }
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, only_once != 1);
+ xas_unlock(&xas);
+ }
+
+ if (order < max_order - 1) {
+ only_once = 0;
+ xas_set_order(&xas, (i & ~1UL) << order, order + 1);
+ xas_lock(&xas);
+ xas_for_each_conflict(&xas, entry) {
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_value(i));
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_get_order(&xas) != order);
+ only_once++;
+ }
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, only_once != 1);
+ xas_unlock(&xas);
+ }
+
+ xas_set_order(&xas, i << order, order);
+ xas_lock(&xas);
+ xas_store(&xas, NULL);
+ xas_unlock(&xas);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+
static noinline void check_destroy(struct xarray *xa)
{
unsigned long index;
@@ -2069,6 +2127,7 @@ static int xarray_checks(void)
check_multi_store_advanced(&array);
check_get_order(&array);
check_xas_get_order(&array);
+ check_xas_conflict_get_order(&array);
check_xa_alloc();
check_find(&array);
check_find_entry(&array);
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 7f734b7ad273..00177ecdc4a4 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -852,7 +852,9 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index, gfp_t gfp, void **shadowp)
{
XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, index);
- bool huge = folio_test_hugetlb(folio);
+ void *alloced_shadow = NULL;
+ int alloced_order = 0;
+ bool huge;
long nr;
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
@@ -861,6 +863,7 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(index & (folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1), folio);
xas_set_order(&xas, index, folio_order(folio));
+ huge = folio_test_hugetlb(folio);
nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
gfp &= GFP_RECLAIM_MASK;
@@ -868,16 +871,10 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
folio->mapping = mapping;
folio->index = xas.xa_index;
- do {
- unsigned int order = xa_get_order(xas.xa, xas.xa_index);
+ for (;;) {
+ int order = -1, split_order = 0;
void *entry, *old = NULL;
- if (order > folio_order(folio)) {
- xas_split_alloc(&xas, xa_load(xas.xa, xas.xa_index),
- order, gfp);
- if (xas_error(&xas))
- goto error;
- }
xas_lock_irq(&xas);
xas_for_each_conflict(&xas, entry) {
old = entry;
@@ -885,19 +882,33 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
xas_set_err(&xas, -EEXIST);
goto unlock;
}
+ /*
+ * If a larger entry exists,
+ * it will be the first and only entry iterated.
+ */
+ if (order == -1)
+ order = xas_get_order(&xas);
+ }
+
+ /* entry may have changed before we re-acquire the lock */
+ if (alloced_order && (old != alloced_shadow || order != alloced_order)) {
+ xas_destroy(&xas);
+ alloced_order = 0;
}
if (old) {
- if (shadowp)
- *shadowp = old;
- /* entry may have been split before we acquired lock */
- order = xa_get_order(xas.xa, xas.xa_index);
- if (order > folio_order(folio)) {
+ if (order > 0 && order > folio_order(folio)) {
/* How to handle large swap entries? */
BUG_ON(shmem_mapping(mapping));
+ if (!alloced_order) {
+ split_order = order;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
xas_split(&xas, old, order);
xas_reset(&xas);
}
+ if (shadowp)
+ *shadowp = old;
}
xas_store(&xas, folio);
@@ -913,9 +924,24 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
__lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio,
NR_FILE_THPS, nr);
}
+
unlock:
xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
- } while (xas_nomem(&xas, gfp));
+
+ /* split needed, alloc here and retry. */
+ if (split_order) {
+ xas_split_alloc(&xas, old, split_order, gfp);
+ if (xas_error(&xas))
+ goto error;
+ alloced_shadow = old;
+ alloced_order = split_order;
+ xas_reset(&xas);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (!xas_nomem(&xas, gfp))
+ break;
+ }
if (xas_error(&xas))
goto error;
--
2.44.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists