linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vDPA: fix incorrect VDPA_ATTR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACGkMEth+QErT8dh_Oh+fz+wO6scLbRDUTkx86XDK7kX1uNCGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 15:22:20 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: kovalev@...linux.org
Cc: mst@...hat.com, parav@...dia.com, edumazet@...gle.com, elic@...dia.com, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vDPA: fix incorrect VDPA_ATTR_MAX value

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 3:18 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 12:39 AM <kovalev@...linux.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@...linux.org>
> >
> > The VDPA_ATTR_MAX value should correspond to the index of the last
> > available member of the structure, not their total number.
>
> I think it's too late to change. More below.
>
> >
> > Otherwise, it can lead to interpretation errors in other functions
> > when the structure (.maxattr = VDPA_ATTR_MAX) member is actually
> > incremented by one and refers to invalid data.
> >
> > Fixes: 33b347503f01 ("vdpa: Define vdpa mgmt device, ops and a netlink interface")
> > Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@...linux.org>
> > ---
> >  include/uapi/linux/vdpa.h | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vdpa.h b/include/uapi/linux/vdpa.h
> > index 43c51698195ceb..ab132a09565232 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vdpa.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vdpa.h
> > @@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ enum vdpa_attr {
> >         VDPA_ATTR_DEV_BLK_CFG_FLUSH,            /* u8 */
> >
> >         /* new attributes must be added above here */
> > -       VDPA_ATTR_MAX,
> > +       __VDPA_ATTR_MAX,
> > +       VDPA_ATTR_MAX   = __VDPA_ATTR_MAX - 1,
>
> Having a MAX in uapi is problematic as it may confuse the userspace. I
> think the correct way is to drop it from uAPI.

Too late to drop as well probably ...

Thanks

>
> Thanks
>
> >  };
> >
> >  #endif
> > --
> > 2.33.8
> >
> >