linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] [mm?] KASAN: slab-use-after-free Read in __vma_reservation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zh4zKy-4Wv5bbR5n@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 10:13:31 +0200
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Vishal Moola <vishal.moola@...il.com>,
	syzbot <syzbot+ad1b592fc4483655438b@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev,
	syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] KASAN: slab-use-after-free Read in
 __vma_reservation_common

On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 11:15:03PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 03:05:44PM -0700, Vishal Moola wrote:
> > Commit 9acad7ba3e25 ("hugetlb: use vmf_anon_prepare() instead of
> > anon_vma_prepare()") may bailout after allocating a folio if we do not
> > hold the mmap lock. When this occurs, vmf_anon_prepare() will release the
> > vma lock. Hugetlb then attempts to call restore_reserve_on_error(),
> > which depends on the vma lock being held.
> > 
> > We can move vmf_anon_prepare() prior to the folio allocation in order to
> > avoid calling restore_reserve_on_error() without the vma lock.
> 
> But now you're calling vmf_anon_prepare() in the wrong place -- before
> we've determined that we need an anon folio.  So we'll create an
> anon_vma even when we don't need one for this vma.
> 
> This is definitely a pre-existing bug which you've exposed by making it
> happen more easily.  Needs a different fix though.

I do not think this is a pre-existing bug.
Prior to 'commit: 7c43a553792a ("hugetlb: allow faults to be handled under
the VMA lock"), we would just bail out if we had FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK.
So there was no danger in calling functions that fiddle with vmas like
restore_reserve_on_error() does.
After that, we allow it but vmf_anon_prepare() releases the lock and returns
VM_FAULT_RETRY if we really need to allocate an anon_vma.
The problem is that now restore_reserve_on_error() will re-adjust the
reservations without the vma lock, completely unsafe.

I think the safest way to tackle this is just as Vishal did, call
vmf_anon_prepare() upfront only for non VM_MAYSHARE faults.

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs