lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 01:49:04 -0700
From: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@...adcom.com>,
 Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>,
 Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
 kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Paul Walmsley
 <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
 virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 24/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add commandline option
 for SBI PMU test

On 4/15/24 06:43, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 05:07:52PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
>> SBI PMU test comprises of multiple tests and user may want to run
>> only a subset depending on the platform. The most common case would
>> be to run all to validate all the tests. However, some platform may
>> not support all events or all ISA extensions.
>>
>> The commandline option allows user to disable particular test if they
>> want to.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
>> ---
>>   .../selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c        | 77 ++++++++++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c
>> index 0fd9b76ae838..57025b07a403 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c
>> @@ -33,6 +33,16 @@ static unsigned long counter_mask_available;
>>   
>>   static bool illegal_handler_invoked;
>>   
>> +enum sbi_pmu_test_id {
>> +	SBI_PMU_TEST_BASIC = 0,
>> +	SBI_PMU_TEST_EVENTS,
>> +	SBI_PMU_TEST_SNAPSHOT,
>> +	SBI_PMU_TEST_OVERFLOW,
>> +	SBI_PMU_TEST_MAX,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int disabled_test_id = SBI_PMU_TEST_MAX;
> 
> I think we should allow specifying '-d' multiple times in case a user
> wants to disable more than one type of test. So we should set a bit
> in this variable instead of assigning it. We could also flip it
> around. If the user uses '-e' to enable test type then only type
> will be run, but then we'd probably want to allow multiple '-e'
> too so it doesn't gain anything.
> 

Sure. Added multiple disable option.

>> +
>>   unsigned long pmu_csr_read_num(int csr_num)
>>   {
>>   #define switchcase_csr_read(__csr_num, __val)		{\
>> @@ -608,19 +618,68 @@ static void test_vm_events_overflow(void *guest_code)
>>   	test_vm_destroy(vm);
>>   }
>>   
>> -int main(void)
>> +static void test_print_help(char *name)
>>   {
>> -	test_vm_basic_test(test_pmu_basic_sanity);
>> -	pr_info("SBI PMU basic test : PASS\n");
>> +	pr_info("Usage: %s [-h] [-d <test name>]\n", name);
>> +	pr_info("\t-d: Test to disable. Available tests are 'basic', 'events', 'snapshot', 'overflow'\n");
>> +	pr_info("\t-h: print this help screen\n");
>> +}
>>   
>> -	test_vm_events_test(test_pmu_events);
>> -	pr_info("SBI PMU event verification test : PASS\n");
>> +static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[])
>> +{
>> +	int opt;
>> +
>> +	while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "hd:")) != -1) {
>> +		switch (opt) {
>> +		case 'd':
>> +			if (!strncmp("basic", optarg, 5))
>> +				disabled_test_id = SBI_PMU_TEST_BASIC;
>> +			else if (!strncmp("events", optarg, 6))
>> +				disabled_test_id = SBI_PMU_TEST_EVENTS;
>> +			else if (!strncmp("snapshot", optarg, 8))
>> +				disabled_test_id = SBI_PMU_TEST_SNAPSHOT;
>> +			else if (!strncmp("overflow", optarg, 8))
>> +				disabled_test_id = SBI_PMU_TEST_OVERFLOW;
>> +			else
>> +				goto done;
>> +			break;
>> +		break;
> 
> Extra 'break'
> 

Fixed. Thanks for catching this.

>> +		case 'h':
>> +		default:
>> +			goto done;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>>   
>> -	test_vm_events_snapshot_test(test_pmu_events_snaphost);
>> -	pr_info("SBI PMU event verification with snapshot test : PASS\n");
>> +	return true;
>> +done:
>> +	test_print_help(argv[0]);
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>>   
>> -	test_vm_events_overflow(test_pmu_events_overflow);
>> -	pr_info("SBI PMU event verification with overflow test : PASS\n");
>> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>> +{
>> +	if (!parse_args(argc, argv))
>> +		exit(KSFT_SKIP);
>> +
>> +	if (disabled_test_id != SBI_PMU_TEST_BASIC) {
>> +		test_vm_basic_test(test_pmu_basic_sanity);
>> +		pr_info("SBI PMU basic test : PASS\n");
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (disabled_test_id != SBI_PMU_TEST_EVENTS) {
>> +		test_vm_events_test(test_pmu_events);
>> +		pr_info("SBI PMU event verification test : PASS\n");
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (disabled_test_id != SBI_PMU_TEST_SNAPSHOT) {
>> +		test_vm_events_snapshot_test(test_pmu_events_snaphost);
>> +		pr_info("SBI PMU event verification with snapshot test : PASS\n");
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (disabled_test_id != SBI_PMU_TEST_OVERFLOW) {
>> +		test_vm_events_overflow(test_pmu_events_overflow);
>> +		pr_info("SBI PMU event verification with overflow test : PASS\n");
>> +	}
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>
> 
> Thanks,
> drew
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ