[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zh5FKtLVhIH-6R-I@bogus>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 10:30:18 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <quic_satyap@...cinc.com>,
Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>,
Shivendra Pratap <quic_spratap@...cinc.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: arm: Document reboot mode magic
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 12:30:25PM -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:
> Add bindings to describe vendor-specific reboot modes. Values here
> correspond to valid parameters to vendor-specific reset types in PSCI
> SYSTEM_RESET2 call.
>
IIUC, PSCI SYSTEM_RESET will be always supported, so the choice of using
SYSTEM_RESET2 sounds like a system policy and must not have any information
in the device tree. All required support from PSCI is discoverable and
the policy choice must be userspace driven. That's my opinion.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists