linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/4] simplify ufshcd with the guard() macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240416102348.614-1-avri.altman@wdc.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 13:23:44 +0300
From: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
To: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] simplify ufshcd with the guard() macro

We can simplify the code with the guard() macro and co for  automatic
cleanup of locks. For making changes easier, this series is divided to
per-lock type patches and only address the ufshcd module. There are
still a few remaining explicit lock/unlock calls, and those are for the
places where we do temporary unlock/relock, which doesn't fit well with
the guard(), so far.

Only code refactoring, and no functional changes.

Avri Altman (4):
  scsi: ufs: core: Make use of guard(spinlock_irqsave)
  scsi: ufs: core: Make use of guard(spinlock)
  scsi: ufs: core: Make use of guard(spinlock_irq)
  scsi: ufs: core: Make use of guard(mutex)

 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 623 +++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 270 insertions(+), 353 deletions(-)

-- 
2.42.0