| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240416112459.1444612-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 19:24:59 +0800
From: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>
To: <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <mhiramat@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<zhengyejian1@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ftrace: Fix possible use-after-free issue in ftrace_location()
KASAN reports a bug:
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ftrace_location+0x90/0x120
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888141d40010 by task insmod/424
CPU: 8 PID: 424 Comm: insmod Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2+
[...]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0
print_report+0xcf/0x610
kasan_report+0xb5/0xe0
ftrace_location+0x90/0x120
register_kprobe+0x14b/0xa40
kprobe_init+0x2d/0xff0 [kprobe_example]
do_one_initcall+0x8f/0x2d0
do_init_module+0x13a/0x3c0
load_module+0x3082/0x33d0
init_module_from_file+0xd2/0x130
__x64_sys_finit_module+0x306/0x440
do_syscall_64+0x68/0x140
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79
The root cause is that when lookup_rec() is lookuping ftrace record of
an address in ftrace pages of some module, and those ftrace pages may
at the same time being freed in ftrace_release_mod() as the corresponding
module is being deleted:
register_kprobes() {
check_kprobe_address_safe() {
arch_check_ftrace_location() {
ftrace_location() {
lookup_rec() // access memory that has been freed by
// ftrace_release_mod() !!!
To fix it, we hold rcu lock as lookuping ftrace record, and call
synchronize_rcu() before freeing any ftrace pages.
Fixes: ae6aa16fdc16 ("kprobes: introduce ftrace based optimization")
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
v2:
- Use RCU lock instead of holding ftrace_lock as suggested by Steve.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240410112823.1d084c8f@gandalf.local.home/
v1:
- Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240401125543.1282845-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com/
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index da1710499698..2b41837a2fac 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -1581,7 +1581,7 @@ static struct dyn_ftrace *lookup_rec(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
}
/**
- * ftrace_location_range - return the first address of a traced location
+ * ftrace_location_range_rcu - return the first address of a traced location
* if it touches the given ip range
* @start: start of range to search.
* @end: end of range to search (inclusive). @end points to the last byte
@@ -1592,7 +1592,7 @@ static struct dyn_ftrace *lookup_rec(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
* that is either a NOP or call to the function tracer. It checks the ftrace
* internal tables to determine if the address belongs or not.
*/
-unsigned long ftrace_location_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+static unsigned long ftrace_location_range_rcu(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
struct dyn_ftrace *rec;
@@ -1603,6 +1603,16 @@ unsigned long ftrace_location_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
return 0;
}
+unsigned long ftrace_location_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+{
+ unsigned long loc;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ loc = ftrace_location_range_rcu(start, end);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return loc;
+}
+
/**
* ftrace_location - return the ftrace location
* @ip: the instruction pointer to check
@@ -1614,25 +1624,22 @@ unsigned long ftrace_location_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
*/
unsigned long ftrace_location(unsigned long ip)
{
- struct dyn_ftrace *rec;
+ unsigned long loc;
unsigned long offset;
unsigned long size;
- rec = lookup_rec(ip, ip);
- if (!rec) {
+ loc = ftrace_location_range(ip, ip);
+ if (!loc) {
if (!kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(ip, &size, &offset))
goto out;
/* map sym+0 to __fentry__ */
if (!offset)
- rec = lookup_rec(ip, ip + size - 1);
+ loc = ftrace_location_range(ip, ip + size - 1);
}
- if (rec)
- return rec->ip;
-
out:
- return 0;
+ return loc;
}
/**
@@ -6596,6 +6603,7 @@ static int ftrace_process_locs(struct module *mod,
/* We should have used all pages unless we skipped some */
if (pg_unuse) {
WARN_ON(!skipped);
+ synchronize_rcu();
ftrace_free_pages(pg_unuse);
}
return ret;
@@ -6809,6 +6817,8 @@ void ftrace_release_mod(struct module *mod)
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&ftrace_lock);
+ if (tmp_page)
+ synchronize_rcu();
for (pg = tmp_page; pg; pg = tmp_page) {
/* Needs to be called outside of ftrace_lock */
@@ -7142,6 +7152,7 @@ void ftrace_free_mem(struct module *mod, void *start_ptr, void *end_ptr)
unsigned long start = (unsigned long)(start_ptr);
unsigned long end = (unsigned long)(end_ptr);
struct ftrace_page **last_pg = &ftrace_pages_start;
+ struct ftrace_page *tmp_page = NULL;
struct ftrace_page *pg;
struct dyn_ftrace *rec;
struct dyn_ftrace key;
@@ -7183,12 +7194,8 @@ void ftrace_free_mem(struct module *mod, void *start_ptr, void *end_ptr)
ftrace_update_tot_cnt--;
if (!pg->index) {
*last_pg = pg->next;
- if (pg->records) {
- free_pages((unsigned long)pg->records, pg->order);
- ftrace_number_of_pages -= 1 << pg->order;
- }
- ftrace_number_of_groups--;
- kfree(pg);
+ pg->next = tmp_page;
+ tmp_page = pg;
pg = container_of(last_pg, struct ftrace_page, next);
if (!(*last_pg))
ftrace_pages = pg;
@@ -7205,6 +7212,10 @@ void ftrace_free_mem(struct module *mod, void *start_ptr, void *end_ptr)
clear_func_from_hashes(func);
kfree(func);
}
+ if (tmp_page) {
+ synchronize_rcu();
+ ftrace_free_pages(tmp_page);
+ }
}
void __init ftrace_free_init_mem(void)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists