[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240416114220.28489-2-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 13:42:19 +0200
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, nrb@...ux.ibm.com,
nsg@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] s390/mm: fix storage key clearing for guest huge pages
The function __storage_key_init_range() expects the end address to be
the first byte outside the range to be initialized. I.e. end - start
should be the size of the area to be initialized.
The current code works because __storage_key_init_range() will still loop
over every page in the range, but it is slower than using sske_frame().
Fixes: 964c2c05c9f3 ("s390/mm: Clear huge page storage keys on enable_skey")
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/mm/gmap.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
index 094b43b121cd..12d22a7fa32f 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
@@ -2661,7 +2661,7 @@ static int __s390_enable_skey_hugetlb(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
return 0;
start = pmd_val(*pmd) & HPAGE_MASK;
- end = start + HPAGE_SIZE - 1;
+ end = start + HPAGE_SIZE;
__storage_key_init_range(start, end);
set_bit(PG_arch_1, &page->flags);
cond_resched();
--
2.44.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists