[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYmfEz-eM_R3ifGnbu6saL4Fd60D2ksyCr0SW0X6M_1VQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 15:07:09 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kamal Dasu <kamal.dasu@...adcom.com>,
Al Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Bell <jonathan@...pberrypi.com>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] pinctrl: bcm: Add pinconf/pinmux controller driver
for BCM2712
Hi Andrea,
thanks for your patch!
Some comments apart from was said already.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 12:14 AM Andrea della Porta
<andrea.porta@...e.com> wrote:
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
Really? Why?
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>
I would just expect these.
> +static int bcm2712_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + //struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + const struct bcm_plat_data *pdata;
> + //const struct of_device_id *match;
I don't know if others commented on it but drop all commented-out code
or make use of it.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists