[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c2355de-e79f-4c95-96d9-d835cd91394a@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 15:56:03 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com, kernel@...cinc.com,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Rob Herring
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/3] input: pm8xxx-vibrator: refactor to support new
SPMI vibrator
On 4/16/24 04:44, Fenglin Wu via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
>
> Currently, vibrator control register addresses are hard coded,
> including the base address and offsets, it's not flexible to
> support new SPMI vibrator module which is usually included in
> different PMICs with different base address. Refactor it by using
> the base address defined in devicetree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists