[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zh6FkejXcwBTAqIR@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:05:05 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: Fix a mess with the GPIO_* flags
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:22:09PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 9:44 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> > IIUC include/dt-bindings/ headers should only be used by DT sources
> > and code that parses the OF properties.
>
> That's what I have come to understand as well.
>
> I wonder if there is something that can be done to enforce it?
>
> Ideally the code that parses OF properties should have to
> opt in to get access to the <dt-bindings/*> namespace.
Whatever you, guys, come up with as a solution, can it be fixed sooner than later?
I mean, I would appreciate if somebody got it done for v6.9-rcX/v6.10-rc1 so we don't
need to look into this again.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists