linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 01/14] lib: Add TLV parser

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D0LM5BP1D90R.2OLRV9OQG5596@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:23:10 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@...radead.org>, "Roberto Sassu"
 <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>, <corbet@....net>, <paul@...l-moore.com>,
 <jmorris@...ei.org>, <serge@...lyn.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 <shuah@...nel.org>, <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc: <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
 <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
 <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, <wufan@...ux.microsoft.com>,
 <pbrobinson@...il.com>, <zbyszek@...waw.pl>, <hch@....de>,
 <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, <pmatilai@...hat.com>, <jannh@...gle.com>,
 <dhowells@...hat.com>, <jikos@...nel.org>, <mkoutny@...e.com>,
 <ppavlu@...e.com>, <petr.vorel@...il.com>, <mzerqung@...inter.de>,
 <kgold@...ux.ibm.com>, "Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/14] lib: Add TLV parser

On Tue Apr 16, 2024 at 12:07 AM EEST, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>
> On 4/15/24 12:19 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon Apr 15, 2024 at 5:24 PM EEST, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> >> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
> >>
> >> Add a parser of a generic TLV format:
> > 
> > What is TLV?
>
> type-length-value
>
> i.e., a descriptor that contains a value.
>
> IIUC.

Thanks Randy. If it had been "time-length-value (TLV)" then it would
have been obvious :-)

BR, Jarkko