linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 03/10] net: create a dummy net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:29:53 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
 Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
 elder@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, nbd@....name, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
 Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com, lorenzo@...nel.org, taras.chornyi@...ision.eu,
 ath11k@...ts.infradead.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, geomatsi@...il.com, kvalo@...nel.org,
 quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com, leon@...nel.org,
 dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...sch.org,
 Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
 Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 03/10] net: create a dummy net_device
 allocator



On 4/17/24 4:19 AM, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:11:38 +0200
> 
>> On Wed, 2024-04-17 at 12:51 +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>>> Just FYI: kdoc accepts only this pattern:
>>>
>>>  * @last_param: blah
>>>  *
>>>  * Return: blah
>>>
>>> NOT
>>>
>>>  * Returns: blah
>>
>> Actually, it does accept that, the regex is "returns?". It's just

ack (Return: is documented)

> Hmm, I was sure I had warnings on "Returns:"... Not sure now.
> 
Yes, either way is accepted.

> documented only as "Return" . IMHO it sometimes reads nicer as "Returns"
>> depending on how you phrase it, but ...

-- 
#Randy
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
https://subspace.kernel.org/etiquette.html