linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/74] x86/cpu/vfm: Add/initialize x86_vfm field to struct cpuinfo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:02:21 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/74] x86/cpu/vfm: Add/initialize x86_vfm field to struct cpuinfo_x86

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024, Tony Luck wrote:
> > Alternatively, we can take the arch/x86 parts and once 6.10 releases,
> > the other maintainers will have them in tree and thus not need the
> > cross-tree merges.
> 
> I did a bit of this. I moved all the arch/x86 patches up to immediately follow
> the three prep patches. So you can pick through parts 0004..0039 and apply
> any that look good to you (there is no ordering requirement among these).
> Bounce anything that needs extra work back to me.

There are two KVM changes hiding in there, but they're obviously quite trivial
and can to through tip, I don't expect any conflicts.