[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240417191937.33790-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:19:35 +0200
From: alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Waqar Hameed <waqar.hameed@...s.com>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: rx8111: demote warnings to debug level
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
The proper way for userspace to react on a read time error is to have a
look at the voltage low information. There is no point in cluttering dmesg
as it is often not even visible to the end user.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-rx8111.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-rx8111.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rx8111.c
index 62d2352de102..4a35bd921b33 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-rx8111.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rx8111.c
@@ -170,14 +170,14 @@ static int rx8111_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
}
if (FIELD_GET(RX8111_FLAG_XST_BIT, regval)) {
- dev_warn(data->dev,
- "Crystal oscillation stopped, time is not reliable\n");
+ dev_dbg(data->dev,
+ "Crystal oscillation stopped, time is not reliable\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (FIELD_GET(RX8111_FLAG_VLF_BIT, regval)) {
- dev_warn(data->dev,
- "Low voltage detected, time is not reliable\n");
+ dev_dbg(data->dev,
+ "Low voltage detected, time is not reliable\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int rx8111_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
}
if (regval) {
- dev_warn(data->dev, "Clock stopped, time is not reliable\n");
+ dev_dbg(data->dev, "Clock stopped, time is not reliable\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.44.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists