linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] tsm: Runtime measurement registers ABI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a44a9ac5-5afa-4226-8a59-fab3e44af352@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:23:52 -0500
From: Dan Middleton <dan.middleton@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Xing, Cedric" <cedric.xing@...el.com>,
 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
 Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
 Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...osinc.com>
Cc: Qinkun Bao <qinkun@...gle.com>, "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@...el.com>,
 Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>, biao.lu@...el.com,
 linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] tsm: Runtime measurement registers ABI

On 3/4/24 7:19 PM, Xing, Cedric wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> In the past couple of weeks I've been thinking about what should be a 
> good log format that can be conformant to existing standards and 
> accommodate future applications at the same time. After discussing 
> with folks from Alibaba and Intel internally, I created this issue - 
> https://github.com/confidential-containers/guest-components/issues/495 
> to document what I've found. Although it was written for CoCo, the 
> design I believe is CEL (Canonical Event Log) conformant and generic 
> enough to be adopted by the kernel. Hence, I revive this thread to 
> solicit your opinion. Your valuable time and feedback will be highly 
> appreciated!
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Cedric
>

Hi,

Closing the loop on testing format options with CNCF CoCo as an adopter
community...
There was a robust discussion in the issue [1] posted ~1.5 months back 
on the
previous note on this thread.
It seems the conversation has tailed off with agreement that the NELR format
would work for that containers community.
I think that's a good signal for this approach to move forward.

[1] https://github.com/confidential-containers/guest-components/issues/495

Regards,
Dan