[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZiBAcfoIY3z_ARSF@google.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:34:41 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
isaku.yamahata@...el.com, xiaoyao.li@...el.com, binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Introduce kvm_tdp_map_page() to
populate guest memory
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > + case RET_PF_EMULATE:
> > + return -EINVAL;
Almost forgot. EINVAL on emulation is weird. I don't know that any return code
is going to be "good", but I think just about anything is better than EINVAL,
e.g. arguably this could be -EBUSY since retrying after creating a memslot would
succeed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists