[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zh90aFh2xr+nEcCQ@chao-email>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:04:08 +0800
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
CC: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>, Federico Parola
<federico.parola@...ito.it>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Introduce kvm_tdp_map_page() to
populate guest memory
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 03:07:31PM -0700, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
>From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
>
>Introduce a helper function to call the KVM fault handler. It allows a new
>ioctl to invoke the KVM fault handler to populate without seeing RET_PF_*
>enums or other KVM MMU internal definitions because RET_PF_* are internal
>to x86 KVM MMU. The implementation is restricted to two-dimensional paging
>for simplicity. The shadow paging uses GVA for faulting instead of L1 GPA.
>It makes the API difficult to use.
>
>Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
>---
>v2:
>- Make the helper function two-dimensional paging specific. (David)
>- Return error when vcpu is in guest mode. (David)
>- Rename goal_level to level in kvm_tdp_mmu_map_page(). (Sean)
>- Update return code conversion. Don't check pfn.
> RET_PF_EMULATE => EINVAL, RET_PF_CONTINUE => EIO (Sean)
>- Add WARN_ON_ONCE on RET_PF_CONTINUE and RET_PF_INVALID. (Sean)
>- Drop unnecessary EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). (Sean)
>---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h | 3 +++
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
>index e8b620a85627..51ff4f67e115 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
>@@ -183,6 +183,9 @@ static inline void kvm_mmu_refresh_passthrough_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> __kvm_mmu_refresh_passthrough_bits(vcpu, mmu);
> }
>
>+int kvm_tdp_map_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u64 error_code,
>+ u8 *level);
>+
> /*
> * Check if a given access (described through the I/D, W/R and U/S bits of a
> * page fault error code pfec) causes a permission fault with the given PTE
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
>index 91dd4c44b7d8..a34f4af44cbd 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
>@@ -4687,6 +4687,38 @@ int kvm_tdp_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> return direct_page_fault(vcpu, fault);
> }
>
>+int kvm_tdp_map_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u64 error_code,
>+ u8 *level)
>+{
>+ int r;
>+
>+ /* Restrict to TDP page fault. */
need to explain why. (just as you do in the changelog)
>+ if (vcpu->arch.mmu->page_fault != kvm_tdp_page_fault)
page fault handlers (i.e., vcpu->arch.mmu->page_fault()) will be called
finally. why not let page fault handlers reject the request to get rid of
this ad-hoc check? We just need to plumb a flag indicating this is a
pre-population request into the handlers. I think this way is clearer.
What do you think?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists