[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zh8dWdE8V8-GhNlF@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:52:41 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: djakov@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
keescook@...omium.org, gustavoars@...nel.org,
henryc.chen@...iatek.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com,
wenst@...omium.org, amergnat@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] regulator: mtk-dvfsrc-regulator: Refactor and add
MT8192/MT8195 vregs
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 05:38:04PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> This driver never worked, and never got even compiled, because it was
> missing the DVFSRC driver entirely, including headers it relies on!
>
> Perform a full (or nearly full) refactoring of the MediaTek DVFSRC
> controlled Regulators driver: this retains support for the MT6873,
> MT8183 and MT8192 SoCs, and adds MT8195.
>
> As part of the refactoring, this driver is now probed using its own
> devicetree compatible, as this is a child of the main DVFSRC driver
> and gets probed as a subnode of that.
Given what you're doing this would probably be easier to review as
two commits, one removing the existing driver and another adding the new
code.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists