linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 52/74] x86/cpu/vfm: Update drivers/pci/pci-mid.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zh-Mks49D2az47xT@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:47:14 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 52/74] x86/cpu/vfm: Update drivers/pci/pci-mid.c

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 09:51:43PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:

..

> > I guess "vfm" is
> > some kind of a hint, but I don't know what it means.  I suppose it is
> > for "vendor, family, model".
> 
> Yes. vfm is indeed vendor-family-model.  Agreed the commit comment
> is lacking details without the context of the cover letter and the other
> patches in this series.

You see, TLAs are cryptic, that's why I internally proposed different naming.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko