linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: Update AMU-based frequency scale factor on entering idle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240417093848.1555462-5-beata.michalska@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 10:38:47 +0100
From: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	ionela.voinescu@....com,
	vanshikonda@...amperecomputing.com
Cc: sudeep.holla@....com,
	will@...nel.org,
	catalin.marinas@....com,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	sumitg@...dia.com,
	yang@...amperecomputing.com,
	lihuisong@...wei.com,
	viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: Update AMU-based frequency scale factor on entering idle

Now that the frequency scale factor has been activated for retrieving
current frequency on a given CPU, trigger its update upon entering
idle. This will, to an extent, allow querying last known frequency
in a non-invasive way. It will also improve the frequency scale factor
accuracy when a CPU entering idle did not receive a tick for a while.
As a consequence, for idle cores, the reported frequency will be the
last one observed before entering the idle state.

Suggested-by: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@...amperecomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
index 475fdbf3032a..3110863ee18c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -213,6 +213,19 @@ static __always_inline bool amu_fie_cpu_supported(unsigned int cpu)
 		cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, amu_fie_cpus);
 }
 
+void arch_cpu_idle_enter(void)
+{
+	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+	if (!amu_fie_cpu_supported(cpu))
+		return;
+
+	/* Kick in AMU update but only if one has not happened already */
+	if (housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TICK) &&
+	    time_is_before_jiffies(per_cpu(cpu_amu_samples.last_update, cpu)))
+		amu_scale_freq_tick();
+}
+
 #define AMU_SAMPLE_EXP_MS	20
 
 unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
@@ -239,8 +252,8 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
 	 * this boils down to identifying an active cpu within the same freq
 	 * domain, if any.
 	 */
-	if (!housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TICK) ||
-	    time_is_before_jiffies(last_update + msecs_to_jiffies(AMU_SAMPLE_EXP_MS))) {
+	if (!housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TICK) || (!idle_cpu(cpu) &&
+	    time_is_before_jiffies(last_update + msecs_to_jiffies(AMU_SAMPLE_EXP_MS)))) {
 		struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 		int ref_cpu = cpu;
 
-- 
2.25.1