linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: sophgo: avoid open-coded 64-bit division

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <IA1PR20MB4953FA5F47CDD0BFF0E64557BB0F2@IA1PR20MB4953.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 19:12:42 +0800
From: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, 
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, 
	Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: sophgo: avoid open-coded 64-bit division

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 06:30:42AM GMT, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 03:45:20PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > 
> > On 32-bit architectures, the 64-bit division leads to a link failure:
> > 
> > arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-cv18xx-pll.o: in function `fpll_calc_rate':
> > clk-cv18xx-pll.c:(.text.fpll_calc_rate+0x26): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
> > 
> > This one is not called in a fast path, and there is already another div_u64()
> > variant used in the same function, so convert it to div64_u64_rem().
> > 
> > Fixes: 80fd61ec4612 ("clk: sophgo: Add clock support for CV1800 SoC")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> 
> There is already a fix patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/IA1PR20MB4953CB4FCCDE82AB25F6880EBB0B2@IA1PR20MB4953.namprd20.prod.outlook.com/

Hi Arnd,

I have looked your patch again and think your patch is better
than mine. So I decided to drop my patch and favor yours.

LGTM. And there are some necessary tags.

Reviewed-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404122344.d5pb2N1I-lkp@intel.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404140310.QEjZKtTN-lkp@intel.com/