[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zh/EkOPBRS1q0ru2@li-008a6a4c-3549-11b2-a85c-c5cc2836eea2.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:46:08 +0200
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] s390/mm: shared zeropage + KVM fixes
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 06:14:39PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Hi David,
> Based on s390/features. Andrew agreed that both patches can go via the
> s390x tree.
I am going to put on a branch this series together with the selftest:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412084329.30315-1-david@redhat.com
I there something in s390/features your three patches depend on?
Or v6.9-rc2 contains everything needed already?
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists