[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00bb2871-8020-4d60-bdb6-d2cebe79d543@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 20:51:39 +0800
From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
To: isaku.yamahata@...el.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
isaku.yamahata@...il.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
erdemaktas@...gle.com, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
chen.bo@...el.com, hang.yuan@...el.com, tina.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 109/130] KVM: TDX: Handle TDX PV port io hypercall
On 2/26/2024 4:26 PM, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
> From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
>
> Wire up TDX PV port IO hypercall to the KVM backend function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
> v18:
> - Fix out case to set R10 and R11 correctly when user space handled port
> out.
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> index a2caf2ae838c..55fc6cc6c816 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> @@ -1152,6 +1152,71 @@ static int tdx_emulate_hlt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return kvm_emulate_halt_noskip(vcpu);
> }
>
> +static int tdx_complete_pio_out(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + tdvmcall_set_return_code(vcpu, TDVMCALL_SUCCESS);
> + tdvmcall_set_return_val(vcpu, 0);
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int tdx_complete_pio_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt = vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt;
> + unsigned long val = 0;
> + int ret;
> +
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.pio.count != 1);
> +
> + ret = ctxt->ops->pio_in_emulated(ctxt, vcpu->arch.pio.size,
> + vcpu->arch.pio.port, &val, 1);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!ret);
> +
> + tdvmcall_set_return_code(vcpu, TDVMCALL_SUCCESS);
> + tdvmcall_set_return_val(vcpu, val);
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int tdx_emulate_io(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt = vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt;
> + unsigned long val = 0;
> + unsigned int port;
> + int size, ret;
> + bool write;
> +
> + ++vcpu->stat.io_exits;
> +
> + size = tdvmcall_a0_read(vcpu);
> + write = tdvmcall_a1_read(vcpu);
> + port = tdvmcall_a2_read(vcpu);
> +
> + if (size != 1 && size != 2 && size != 4) {
> + tdvmcall_set_return_code(vcpu, TDVMCALL_INVALID_OPERAND);
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (write) {
> + val = tdvmcall_a3_read(vcpu);
> + ret = ctxt->ops->pio_out_emulated(ctxt, size, port, &val, 1);
> +
> + /* No need for a complete_userspace_io callback. */
I am confused about the comment.
The code below sets the complete_userspace_io callback for write case,
i.e. tdx_complete_pio_out().
> + vcpu->arch.pio.count = 0;
> + } else
> + ret = ctxt->ops->pio_in_emulated(ctxt, size, port, &val, 1);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + tdvmcall_set_return_val(vcpu, val);
> + else {
> + if (write)
> + vcpu->arch.complete_userspace_io = tdx_complete_pio_out;
> + else
> + vcpu->arch.complete_userspace_io = tdx_complete_pio_in;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int handle_tdvmcall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> if (tdvmcall_exit_type(vcpu))
> @@ -1162,6 +1227,8 @@ static int handle_tdvmcall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return tdx_emulate_cpuid(vcpu);
> case EXIT_REASON_HLT:
> return tdx_emulate_hlt(vcpu);
> + case EXIT_REASON_IO_INSTRUCTION:
> + return tdx_emulate_io(vcpu);
> default:
> break;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists