lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:34:36 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com,
 robh@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: PCI: altera: Convert to YAML

On 16/04/2024 16:32, matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>>
>> Why Hip is the first? Old binding suggested it to be the last entry. It
>> would also make binding easier, as you describe reg and reg-names in
>> top-level and just limit them with min/maxItems.
>>
>> Does anything depend on different order (Hip as first)?
> 
> I don't think the order really matters. So Hip could go last, and it makes 

The order matters, it is the ABI.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ