[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66ecea56-e4d3-4241-a1dc-378d70555321@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 10:50:10 +0800
From: Youling Tang <youling.tang@...ux.dev>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Youling Tang <tangyouling@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcachefs: Align the display format of
`btrees/inodes/keys`
Hi, Kent
On 17/04/2024 10:20, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 09:54:48AM +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
>> From: Youling Tang <tangyouling@...inos.cn>
>>
>> Before patch:
>> ```
>> #cat btrees/inodes/keys
>> u64s 17 type inode_v3 0:4096:U32_MAX len 0 ver 0: mode=40755
>> flags= (16300000)
>> ```
>>
>> After patch:
>> ```
>> #cat btrees/inodes/keys
>> u64s 17 type inode_v3 0:4096:U32_MAX len 0 ver 0:
>> mode=40755
>> flags= (16300000)
> This would print a newline for keys that don't have a value...
The original intention was to make the display of the printed content in
'__bch2_inode_unpacked_to_text ()' consistent, without considering other
callbacks.
Or just modify it in the following way?
--- a/fs/bcachefs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/inode.c
@@ -534,6 +534,8 @@ int bch2_inode_v3_invalid(struct bch_fs *c, struct
bkey_s_c k,
static void __bch2_inode_unpacked_to_text(struct printbuf *out,
struct bch_inode_unpacked *inode)
{
+ prt_newline(out);
+
printbuf_indent_add(out, 2);
prt_printf(out, "mode=%o", inode->bi_mode);
prt_newline(out);
Thanks,
Youling.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists