[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240417144859.GA1471879@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 07:48:59 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Pratham Patel <prathampatel@...fossguy.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
thefirst1322@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Enable building of the devel RPM package from Kbuild
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 04:37:32AM +0000, Pratham Patel wrote:
> This addresses a minor nit where I want a `-devel` RPM package to be
> built when I build a binary RPM package with either `binrpm-pkg`
> or `rpm-pkg` target(s).
>
> Pratham Patel (2):
> kbuild: allow toggling the `with_devel` RPM macro
> docs: kbuild: document KBUILD_RPM_WITH_DEVEL
>
> Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 6 ++++++
> scripts/Makefile.package | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --
> 2.42.0
>
Hmmm, when I execute
$ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=x86_64 O=build mrproper defconfig binrpm-pkg
I end up with
$ ls -1 build/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64
kernel-6.9.0_rc4_00031_g96fca68c4fbf-1.x86_64.rpm
kernel-devel-6.9.0_rc4_00031_g96fca68c4fbf-1.x86_64.rpm
kernel-headers-6.9.0_rc4_00031_g96fca68c4fbf-1.x86_64.rpm
so it seems like this is already happening?
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists