[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202404181039.1457626B@keescook>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:40:40 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Charles Bertsch <cbertsch@....net>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@...adcom.com>,
Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@...adcom.com>,
Suganath Prabu Subramani <suganath-prabu.subramani@...adcom.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@...adcom.com>,
Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
mpi3mr-linuxdrv.pdl@...adcom.com,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] scsi: Avoid possible run-time warning with long
manufacturer strings
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 08:35:15PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> Hi Kees!
>
> >> This series fixes all 4 of the instances I could find in the SCSI
> >> subsystem.
> >
> > Friendly ping. Can the SCSI tree pick this up, or should I take it
> > through the hardening tree?
>
> It's on my list of series to review. Have a couple of fires going right
> now.
Okay, thanks! I just wanted to make sure it got picked up for v6.9 since
it fixes a real-world issue. :)
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists