lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:36:57 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Thomas Prescher <thomas.prescher@...erus-technology.de>
Cc: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, 
	"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, 
	Julian Stecklina <julian.stecklina@...erus-technology.de>, 
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, 
	"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: nVMX: fix CR4_READ_SHADOW when L0 updates CR4
 during a signal

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024, Thomas Prescher wrote:
> You are right. After your pointers and looking at the nesting code
> again, I think I know what to do. Just to make sure I understand this
> correctly: 
> 
> If L0 exits with L2 state, KVM_GET_NESTED_STATE will have
> KVM_STATE_NESTED_RUN_PENDING set in the flags field.

Not necessarily.  KVM_STATE_NESTED_GUEST_MODE is the flag that says "L2 state is
loaded", the NESTED_RUN_PENDING flag is effectively a modifier on top of that.

KVM_STATE_NESTED_RUN_PENDING is set when userspace interrupts KVM in the middle
of nested VM-Enter emulation.  In that case, KVM needs to complete emulation of
the VM-Enter instruction (VMLAUNCH, VMRESUME, or VMRUN) before doing anything.
I.e. KVM has loaded L2 state and is committed to completing VM-Enter, but hasn't
actually done so yet.

In retrospect, KVM probably should have forced userspace to call back into KVM to
complete emulation before allowing KVM_GET_NESTED_STATE to succeed, but it's a
minor blip.

> So when we restore the vCPU state after a vmsave/vmload cycle, we don't need
> to update anything in kvm_run.s.regs because KVM will enter the L2
> immediately.  Is that correct?

No?  Presumably your touching vCPU state, otherwise you wouldn't be doing
vmsave/vmload.  And if you touch vCPU state, then you need to restore the old
state for things to work.

Again, what are you trying to do, at a higher level?  I.e. _why_ are you doing
a save/restore cycle?  If it's for something akin to live migration, where you
need to save and restore *everything*, then stating the obvious, you need to
save and restore everything in KVM too, which includes nested state.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ