[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6621692cbedd1_f648a29469@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:40:44 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
dsahern@...nel.org,
aleksander.lobakin@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 2/2] net: gro: add p_off param in *_gro_complete
Richard Gobert wrote:
> Willem de Bruijn wrote:> Since this INDIRECT_CALL_INET needs to know about the definitions of
> > udp4_lib_lookup_skb and udp6_lib_lookup_skb anyway, we can just get
> > rid of the whole udp_lookup_t type and function pointer passing?
> >
> > Or move the entire lookup to udp4_gro_complete/udp6_gro_complete and
> > pass the sk to udp_gro_complete.
>
> This sounds like a really good idea, I like it. Although I think it may be
> more relevant to net-next instead of this bug fix. I can post a
> complementing patch to net-next later if that's OK with you
That's fine.
This patch as is is already very intrusive for a net patch. For a fix,
could we do something smaller? Like add the network offset into
NAPI_GRO_CB in inet_gro_callback and use that in udp4_lib_lookup_skb?
(and same for IPv6 of course).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists