linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: dw: Simplify max-burst calculation procedure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 22:10:04 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, 
	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: dw: Simplify max-burst calculation
 procedure

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 02:49:26PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:35:39PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 10:11:58PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 07:28:58PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > +static void dwc_verify_maxburst(struct dma_chan *chan)
> > 
> > > It's inconsistent to the rest of _verify methods. It doesn't verify as it
> > > doesn't return anything. Make it int or rename the function.
> > 
> > Making it int won't make much sense since currently the method doesn't
> > imply returning an error status. IMO using "verify" was ok, but since
> > you don't see it suitable please suggest a better alternative. mend,
> > fix, align?
> 

> My suggestion is (and was) to have it return 0 for now.

Ok. Let's have it returning zero then.


-Serge(y)

> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
>