[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3yapowxkxgsd2iq33trm7blpacmehmrbpk2jcffte7supz6ugd@lnsmw5wfj3nc>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 21:14:34 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Piyush Malgujar <pmalgujar@...vell.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sgarapati@...vell.com, cchavva@...vell.com, jannadurai@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] i2c: thunderx: Adding ioclk support
Hi Piyush,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 06:40:14AM -0700, Piyush Malgujar wrote:
> Read the ioclk property as reference clock if sclk not present in acpi
> table to make it SOC agnostic.
> In case, it's not populated from dts/acpi table, use the default clock
> of 800 MHz which is optimal in either case of sclk/ioclk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Piyush Malgujar <pmalgujar@...vell.com>
just acking as a reminder to myself:
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Everything looks good, if you manage to split patch 2 in two
different patches, then I think it's good to go.
Thanks,
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists