lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240418132600.ffbf4d53b39eaaeaffc28198@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:26:00 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, yury.norov@...il.com,
 linux@...musvillemoes.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu: memoise number of possible cpus

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 07:19:27 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:

> cpu_possible_mask is fixed after boot, so it makes sense
> to calculate number of possible cpus to
> a) make num_possible_cpus() faster (distros ship with _large_ NR_CPUS),
> b) unscrew codegen elsewhere replacing function call
>    with simple memory load.

There are a lot of calls to set_cpu_possible().  Perhaps calculating
num_possible_cpus within there would reduce risk of things getting out
of sync, either now or in the future.

reset_cpu_possible_mask() appears to have no callers.  Kill?



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ