lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f25fb07e-6885-447a-b91a-08efd5e01bcd@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:51:43 -0700
From: "Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)" <quic_abchauha@...cinc.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller"
	<davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
	<kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
        "Martin
 KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <kernel@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] net: Rename mono_delivery_time to
 tstamp_type for scalabilty



On 4/18/2024 1:49 PM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Abhishek Chauhan (ABC) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/18/2024 1:11 PM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>> Abhishek Chauhan (ABC) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/18/2024 11:47 AM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>>>> Abhishek Chauhan wrote:
>>>>>> mono_delivery_time was added to check if skb->tstamp has delivery
>>>>>> time in mono clock base (i.e. EDT) otherwise skb->tstamp has
>>>>>> timestamp in ingress and delivery_time at egress.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Renaming the bitfield from mono_delivery_time to tstamp_type is for
>>>>>> extensibilty for other timestamps such as userspace timestamp
>>>>>> (i.e. SO_TXTIME) set via sock opts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As we are renaming the mono_delivery_time to tstamp_type, it makes
>>>>>> sense to start assigning tstamp_type based on enum defined
>>>>>> in this commit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Earlier we used bool arg flag to check if the tstamp is mono in
>>>>>> function skb_set_delivery_time, Now the signature of the functions
>>>>>> accepts tstamp_type to distinguish between mono and real time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In future tstamp_type:1 can be extended to support userspace timestamp
>>>>>> by increasing the bitfield.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/bc037db4-58bb-4861-ac31-a361a93841d3@linux.dev/
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Chauhan <quic_abchauha@...cinc.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>> + * tstamp_type:1 can take 2 values each
>>>>>> + * represented by time base in skb
>>>>>> + * 0x0 => real timestamp_type
>>>>>> + * 0x1 => mono timestamp_type
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +enum skb_tstamp_type {
>>>>>> +	SKB_CLOCK_REAL,	/* Time base is skb is REALTIME */
>>>>>> +	SKB_CLOCK_MONO,	/* Time base is skb is MONOTONIC */
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>
>>>>> Can drop the comments. These names are self documenting.
>>>>
>>>> Noted! . I will take care of this
>>>>>
>>>>>>  /**
>>>>>>   * DOC: Basic sk_buff geometry
>>>>>>   *
>>>>>> @@ -819,7 +830,7 @@ typedef unsigned char *sk_buff_data_t;
>>>>>>   *	@dst_pending_confirm: need to confirm neighbour
>>>>>>   *	@decrypted: Decrypted SKB
>>>>>>   *	@slow_gro: state present at GRO time, slower prepare step required
>>>>>> - *	@mono_delivery_time: When set, skb->tstamp has the
>>>>>> + *	@tstamp_type: When set, skb->tstamp has the
>>>>>>   *		delivery_time in mono clock base (i.e. EDT).  Otherwise, the
>>>>>>   *		skb->tstamp has the (rcv) timestamp at ingress and
>>>>>>   *		delivery_time at egress.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this still correct? I think all egress does now annotate correctly
>>>>> as SKB_CLOCK_MONO. So when not set it always is SKB_CLOCK_REAL.
>>>>>
>>>> That is correct. 
>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>>>>>> index 61119d42b0fd..a062f88c47c3 100644
>>>>>> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>>>>>> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>>>>>> @@ -1300,7 +1300,7 @@ static int __tcp_transmit_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>>  	tp = tcp_sk(sk);
>>>>>>  	prior_wstamp = tp->tcp_wstamp_ns;
>>>>>>  	tp->tcp_wstamp_ns = max(tp->tcp_wstamp_ns, tp->tcp_clock_cache);
>>>>>> -	skb_set_delivery_time(skb, tp->tcp_wstamp_ns, true);
>>>>>> +	skb_set_delivery_time(skb, tp->tcp_wstamp_ns, CLOCK_MONOTONIC);
>>>>>
>>>>> Multiple references to CLOCK_MONOTONIC left
>>>>>
>>>> I think i took care of all the references. Apologies if i didn't understand your comment here. 
>>>
>>> On closer read, there is a type issue here.
>>>
>>> skb_set_delivery_time takes a u8 tstamp_type. But it is often passed
>>> a clockid_t, and that is also what the switch expects.
>>>
>>> But it does also get called with a tstamp_type in code like the
>>> following:
>>>
>>> +       u8 tstamp_type = skb->tstamp_type;
>>>         unsigned int hlen, ll_rs, mtu;
>>>         ktime_t tstamp = skb->tstamp;
>>>         struct ip_frag_state state;
>>> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static int nf_br_ip_fragment(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
>>>                         if (iter.frag)
>>>                                 ip_fraglist_prepare(skb, &iter);
>>>   
>>> -                       skb_set_delivery_time(skb, tstamp, mono_delivery_time);
>>> +                       skb_set_delivery_time(skb, tstamp, tstamp_type);
>>>
>>> So maybe we need two variants, one that takes a tstamp_type and one
>>> that tames a clockid_t?
>>>
>>> The first can be simple, not switch needed. Just apply the two stores.
>> I agree to what you are saying but clockid_t => points to int itself. 
>>
>> For example :- 
>> 		void qdisc_watchdog_init_clockid(struct qdisc_watchdog *wd, struct Qdisc *qdisc,
>> 				 clockid_t clockid)
>>
>> 		qdisc_watchdog_init_clockid(wd, qdisc, CLOCK_MONOTONIC); => sch_api.c
>> 	       qdisc_watchdog_init_clockid(&q->watchdog, sch, q->clockid); =>sch_etf.c (q->clockid is int)
> 
> My concern is more that we use CLOCK_MONOTONIC and SKB_CLOCK_MONO
> (and other clocks) interchangeably, without invariant checks to make
> sure that they map onto the same integer value.
Ah i see. I got it . I will make two APIs . Makes sense. 
1. One can check for clockid => switch => set 
2. One can set it directly. 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ