linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] regulator: dt-bindings: pca9450: add pca9451a support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 09:26:19 +0200
From: Fabio Aiuto <fabio.aiuto@...icam.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matteo Lisi <matteo.lisi@...icam.com>,
	Mirko Ardinghi <mirko.ardinghi@...icam.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] regulator: dt-bindings: pca9450: add pca9451a support

Dear Mark,

Il Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 09:38:06AM +0900, Mark Brown ha scritto:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 05:35:26PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > Update bindings for pca9451a support.
> 
> Please do not submit new versions of already applied patches, please
> submit incremental updates to the existing code.  Modifying existing
> commits creates problems for other users building on top of those
> commits so it's best practice to only change pubished git commits if
> absolutely essential.

thank you, I was in doubt because I did the whole job based on
shawnguo's repo where the patch isn't applied yet.

Maybe this approach was not good, should I have considered broonie's
repo for this single patch, shouldn't I?

Anyway I'm dropping this patch for a v2.

kr,

fabio