linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 0/5] sched/vtime: vtime.h headers cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87h6fzbi2s.fsf@mail.lhotse>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:00:43 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Alexander Gordeev
 <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Vincent Guittot
 <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
 linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin
 <npiggin@...il.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik
 <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 0/5] sched/vtime: vtime.h headers cleanup

Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org> writes:
> Le Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 05:09:43PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev a écrit :
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> There are no changes since the last post, just a re-send.
>> 
>> v2:
>> - patch 4: commit message reworded (Heiko)
>> - patch 5: vtime.h is removed from Kbuild scripts (PowerPC only) (Heiko)
>> 
>> v1:
>> Please find a small cleanup to vtime_task_switch() wiring.
>> I split it into smaller patches to allow separate PowerPC
>> vs s390 reviews. Otherwise patches 2+3 and 4+5 could have
>> been merged.
>> 
>> I tested it on s390 and compile-tested it on 32- and 64-bit
>> PowerPC and few other major architectures only, but it is
>> only of concern for CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE-capable
>> ones (AFAICT).
>> 
>> Thanks!
>
> It probably makes sense to apply the whole series to the scheduler tree.
> Does any powerpc or s390 maintainer oppose to that?

No objection. It has acks and reviews from powerpc.

cheers