linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] gpiolib: acpi: Add fwnode name to the GPIO interrupt label

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:23:45 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] gpiolib: acpi: Add fwnode name to the GPIO
 interrupt label

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 07:49:07AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 01:37:27PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > It's ambiguous to have a device-related index in the GPIO interrupt
> > label as most of the devices will have it the same or very similar.
> > Extend label with fwnode name for better granularity. It significantly
> > reduces the scope of searching among devices.
> 
> Can you add an example here how it looks like before and after the
> patch?

Sure:

Before:

  GpioInt() 0
  GpioInt() 0

After:

  NIO1 GpioInt(0)
  URT0 GpioInt(0)

Assuming I update this when applying, can you give your tag?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko