[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZiDpxb-diEt91My4@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:37:09 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dmaengine: dw: Add memory bus width verification
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 09:52:42PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 08:28:06PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 08:13:59PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
..
> > Got it. Maybe a little summary in the code to explain all this magic?
>
> Will it be enough to add something like this:
> /*
> * It's possible to have a data portion locked in the DMA FIFO in case
> * of the channel suspension. Subsequent channel disabling will cause
> * that data silent loss. In order to prevent that maintain the src
> * and dst transfer widths coherency by means of the relation:
> * (CTLx.SRC_TR_WIDTH * CTLx.SRC_MSIZE >= CTLx.DST_TR_WIDTH)
> */
Yes, and you may add something like
"Look for the details in the commit message that brings this change."
at the end of it.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists