[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1763d69-f0a4-4415-be7a-31b04153fbfb@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:01:17 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: pmi632: Add vibrator
On 18.04.2024 8:36 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Add a node for the vibrator module found inside the PMI632.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
On a side note, this is a totally configuration-free peripheral that doesn't do
anything crazy until manually configured.
In the slow quest to be (hopefully) more sane about the defaults, should we keep
them enabled by default? Bjorn?
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists