linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: pmi632: Add vibrator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:01:17 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: pmi632: Add vibrator

On 18.04.2024 8:36 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Add a node for the vibrator module found inside the PMI632.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>

On a side note, this is a totally configuration-free peripheral that doesn't do
anything crazy until manually configured.

In the slow quest to be (hopefully) more sane about the defaults, should we keep
them enabled by default? Bjorn?

Konrad