[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mafs034ri7w9n.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:20:04 +0200
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
To: "Michael Walle" <mwalle@...nel.org>
Cc: "Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@...nel.org>, "Tudor Ambarus"
<tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@....at>, "Vignesh Raghavendra"
<vigneshr@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 6/6] mtd: spi-nor: introduce support for
displaying deprecation message
On Thu, Apr 18 2024, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed Apr 17, 2024 at 5:52 PM CEST, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 17 2024, Michael Walle wrote:
>> > On Wed Apr 17, 2024 at 4:36 PM CEST, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
[...]
>> >> I like the idea in general. Do you think we should also print a rough
>> >> date for the deprecation as well?
>> >
>> > Might make sense, any suggestions?
>>
>> How about a simple string to flash_info?
>
> Ahh, I was rather asking if you already had a time frame in mind.
>
> Besides that, should it be a date or a (future) kernel version?
> Roughly about two/three kernel releases?
I think kernel version is better.
I don't base this on any real data, only on gut feeling, but I think
three kernel releases is a good time. Should add up to about 6-7 months.
[...]
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists