lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEg0e7gDk6SFRh4oF0KsA7xZoMr7RuZXFWL8qD7rmM2cBDLwcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:26:12 +0200
From: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@...ll.eu>
To: Xu Lu <luxu.kernel@...edance.com>
Cc: paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, 
	andy.chiu@...ive.com, guoren@...nel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lihangjing@...edance.com, 
	dengliang.1214@...edance.com, xieyongji@...edance.com, 
	chaiwen.cc@...edance.com, Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] riscv: Idle thread using Zawrs extension

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 1:50 PM Xu Lu <luxu.kernel@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> This patch series introduces a new implementation of idle thread using
> Zawrs extension.

This overlaps with the following series:
  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240315134009.580167-7-ajones@ventanamicro.com/

BR
Christoph

>
> The Zawrs[0] extension introduces two new instructions named WRS.STO and
> WRS.NTO in RISC-V. When software registers a reservation set using LR
> instruction, a subsequent WRS.STO or WRS.NTO instruction will cause the
> hart to stall in a low-power state until a store happens to the
> reservation set or an interrupt becomes pending. The difference between
> these two instructions is that WRS.STO will terminate stall after an
> implementation-defined timeout while WRS.NTO won't.
>
> This patch series implements idle thread using WRS.NTO instruction.
> Besides, we found there is no need to send a real IPI to wake up an idle
> CPU. Instead, we write IPI information to the reservation set of an idle
> CPU to wake it up and let it handle IPI quickly, without going through
> tranditional interrupt handling routine.
>
> [0] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-zawrs/blob/main/zawrs.adoc
>
> Xu Lu (2):
>   riscv: process: Introduce idle thread using Zawrs extension
>   riscv: Use Zawrs to accelerate IPI to idle cpu
>
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig                 |  24 +++++++
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/cpuidle.h   |  11 +---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h     |   1 +
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h |  31 +++++++++
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h       |  14 ++++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c            |   5 ++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c     |   1 +
>  arch/riscv/kernel/process.c        | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c            |  39 +++++++----
>  9 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ