linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/74] x86/cpu/vfm: Add/initialize x86_vfm field to struct cpuinfo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <B1D0D5D6-2338-4142-AF28-887FD99F3CE5@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 01:47:34 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Thomas Gleixner
	<tglx@...utronix.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/74] x86/cpu/vfm: Add/initialize x86_vfm field to struct
 cpuinfo_x86


> On Apr 17, 2024, at 12:43, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 12:02:21PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> There are two KVM changes hiding in there, but they're obviously quite trivial
>> and can to through tip, I don't expect any conflicts.
> 
> Yeah, the plan is to queue it all through tip as that would be a lot
> less conflicts and cross-tree issues so you acking them is what I was
> hoping to get.
> 
> So thanks. :-)

There’s general (justified) grumbling about
my auto-generated Subject lines. So I’ll make
a pass through the whole series to make the
initial tag match each subsystem convention. 
Also make it generally more useful. I.e. like this
for most of the arch/x86 patches:

Subject: x86/cpu: Use new Intel CPU model #defines

Perhaps all the pieces with Reviewed or Acked
tags can go into tip tree next week?

-Tony