linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 5/6] blk-throttle: support to destroy throtl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:05:14 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, chenhuacai@...nel.org, josef@...icpanda.com,
	jhs@...atatu.com, svenjoac@....de, raven@...maw.net,
	pctammela@...atatu.com, qde@...cy.de, zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
	"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 5/6] blk-throttle: support to destroy throtl_data
 when blk-throttle is disabled

Hello,

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 09:39:43AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
..
> I guess I'll do lazy init first, and then modularization for rq_qos,
> and leave blk-throtl there for now. Perhaps add a new throtl model in
> iocost can replace blk-throtl in the future.

That sounds like a plan.

> BTW, currently during test of iocost, I found that iocost can already
> achieve that, for example, by following configure:
> 
> echo "$dev enable=1 min=100 max=100" > qos
> echo "$dev wbps=4096 wseqiops=1 wrandiops=1" > model
> 
> In the test, I found that wbps and iops is actually limited to the
> set value.

Yeah, it shouldn't be too difficult to add .max support to iocost so that
you can say something like "this cgroup subtree can't use more than 60% of
available capacity". That'd be really cool to have.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun