linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] security: digest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 23:05:55 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Bagas Sanjaya" <bagasdotme@...il.com>, "Roberto Sassu"
 <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>, "Roberto Sassu"
 <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>, "corbet" <corbet@....net>, "paul"
 <paul@...l-moore.com>, "jmorris" <jmorris@...ei.org>, "serge"
 <serge@...lyn.com>, "akpm" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "shuah"
 <shuah@...nel.org>, "mcoquelin.stm32" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 "alexandre.torgue" <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, "mic" <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc: "linux-security-module" <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-doc" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel"
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kselftest"
 <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, "bpf" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, "zohar"
 <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, "dmitry.kasatkin" <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
 "linux-integrity" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, "wufan"
 <wufan@...ux.microsoft.com>, "pbrobinson" <pbrobinson@...il.com>, "zbyszek"
 <zbyszek@...waw.pl>, "hch" <hch@....de>, "mjg59" <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
 "pmatilai" <pmatilai@...hat.com>, "jannh" <jannh@...gle.com>, "dhowells"
 <dhowells@...hat.com>, "jikos" <jikos@...nel.org>, "mkoutny"
 <mkoutny@...e.com>, "ppavlu" <ppavlu@...e.com>, "petr.vorel"
 <petr.vorel@...il.com>, "mzerqung" <mzerqung@...inter.de>, "kgold"
 <kgold@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] security: digest_cache LSM

On Fri Apr 19, 2024 at 2:18 PM EEST, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On 4/18/24 02:02, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > 
> > 72374d71c315
> > 
> > Roberto
> > 
>
> Still FTA (fail to apply), unfortunately.

Robert, quick suggestion.

Maybe pick recent rc for the patch set, rebase on top of that and
document that to the cover letter?

In git: "git rebase <version>" when on branch with the patches
applied.

BR, Jarkko