[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240419201918.czmg6rq3whovhafw@desk>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 13:19:18 -0700
From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
bernie.keany@...el.com, charishma1.gairuboyina@...el.com,
chang.seok.bae@...el.com, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
antonio.gomez.iglesias@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/14] x86/gds: Lock GDS mitigation when keylocker
feature is present
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:03:28AM -0700, Daniel Sneddon wrote:
> On 4/19/24 10:47, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> > + u64 gds_lock = 0;
> >
> > switch (gds_mitigation) {
> > case GDS_MITIGATION_OFF:
> > @@ -769,6 +769,8 @@ void update_gds_msr(void)
> > * the same state. Make sure the mitigation is enabled on all
> > * CPUs.
> > */
> > + gds_lock = GDS_MITG_LOCKED;
> Can't we just drop the new gds_lock var and set mcu_ctrl |= GDS_MITG_LOCKED here?
Unfortunately no, because ...
> > + fallthrough;
> > case GDS_MITIGATION_FULL:
> > rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCU_OPT_CTRL, mcu_ctrl);
.. mcu_ctrl is read here, it will overwrite any previous value.
> > mcu_ctrl &= ~GDS_MITG_DIS;
> > @@ -779,6 +781,7 @@ void update_gds_msr(void)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > + mcu_ctrl |= gds_lock;
> > wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCU_OPT_CTRL, mcu_ctrl);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists