[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e5cde3e-f3ad-4a9b-bc02-1c473affdcb1@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 22:38:15 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
'Al Viro' <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seq_file: Optimize seq_puts()
Le 16/04/2024 à 22:56, David Laight a écrit :
> From: Al Viro
>> Sent: 15 April 2024 22:01
> ...
>> No need to make it a macro, actually. And I would suggest going
>> a bit further:
>>
>> static inline void seq_puts(struct seq_file *m, const char *s)
>
> That probably needs to be 'always_inline'.
>
>> {
>> if (!__builtin_constant_p(*s))
>> __seq_puts(m, s);
>> else if (s[0] && !s[1])
>> seq_putc(m, s[0]);
>> else
>> seq_write(m, s, __builtin_strlen(s));
>> }
>
> You missed seq_puts(m, "");
>
> I did wonder about checking sizeof(s) <= 2 in the #define version.
git grep seq_puts.*\"[^\\].\" | wc -l
77
What would you do in this case?
2 seq_putc() in order to save a memcpy(..., 2), that's it?
It would also slightly change the behaviour, as only the 1st char could
be added. Actually, it is all or nothing.
Don't know what is the best.
Any thought?
CJ
> That would pick up the cases where a separator is changed/added
> in a loop.
>
> Could you do:
> size_t len = __builtin_strlen(s);
> if (!__builtin_constant_p(len))
> __seq_puts(m, s);
> else switch (len){
> case 0: break;
> case 1: seq_putc(m, s[0]);
> default: seq_write(m, s, len);
> }
>
> David
>
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists