lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:11:34 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, <osalvador@...e.de>,
 <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb: fix DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1) when
 dissolve_free_hugetlb_folio()

On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:58:19 +0800 Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com> wrote:

> When I did memory failure tests recently, below warning occurs:
> 
> DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1)
> WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 1011 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:232 __lock_acquire+0xccb/0x1ca0
> Modules linked in: mce_inject hwpoison_inject
> CPU: 8 PID: 1011 Comm: bash Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3-next-20240410-00012-gdb69f219f4be #3
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1773,7 +1773,7 @@ static void __update_and_free_hugetlb_folio(struct hstate *h,
>  	 * If vmemmap pages were allocated above, then we need to clear the
>  	 * hugetlb flag under the hugetlb lock.
>  	 */
> -	if (clear_flag) {
> +	if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
>  		spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>  		__folio_clear_hugetlb(folio);
>  		spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);

Please let's prepare backportable fixes against current mainline, not
mm-unstable.  Because fixes against current -rcX and earlier will be
upstreamed ahead of the mm-unstable and mm-stable material.


I did this:

--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlb-fix-debug_locks_warn_on1-when-dissolve_free_hugetlb_folio
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1781,7 +1781,7 @@ static void __update_and_free_hugetlb_fo
 	 * If vmemmap pages were allocated above, then we need to clear the
 	 * hugetlb destructor under the hugetlb lock.
 	 */
-	if (clear_dtor) {
+	if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
 		spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
 		__clear_hugetlb_destructor(h, folio);
 		spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
_


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ